DOJ-OGR-00013294.jpg
565 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript (case 1:20-cr-00330-pae)
File Size:
565 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (filed August 10, 2022) in the case USA v. Maxwell. The Court and attorneys discuss the admissibility of Mar-a-Lago personnel records (Exhibits 823 and 824) intended to prove that Virginia Roberts was the daughter and dependent of an employee, Mr. Roberts. The debate centers on whether the employee-filled forms constitute hearsay or admissible business records verified by the employer.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the admissibility of evidence (Exhibits 823 and 824).
|
| Mr. Rohrbach | Attorney (Prosecution) |
Arguing for the admission of personnel records to prove Virginia Roberts' relationship to Mr. Roberts.
|
| Ms. Sternheim | Attorney (Defense) |
Defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell, raising objections to hearsay.
|
| Virginia Roberts | Subject of Record |
Mentioned as the daughter of an employee (Mr. Roberts) in Mar-a-Lago personnel files.
|
| Mr. Roberts | Employee |
Employee at Mar-a-Lago; father of Virginia Roberts.
|
| Ms. Gill | Witness |
Witness expected to testify regarding Mar-a-Lago's record-keeping practices.
|
Organizations (3)
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10 (Filing Date)
Court proceeding discussing the admissibility of Exhibits 823 and 824 regarding Virginia Roberts' status as a dependent.
Courtroom (Southern District of New York)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
Relationships (2)
Transcript states: 'Virginia Roberts was his daughter' and mentions benefits provided to her as a dependent.
Transcript refers to 'personnel form of Mar-a-Lago' and Mr. Roberts as the employee.
Key Quotes (3)
"essentially that Virginia Roberts was his daughter"Source
DOJ-OGR-00013294.jpg
Quote #1
"Mar-a-Lago provides benefits to the daughter as a dependent of Mr. Roberts."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013294.jpg
Quote #2
"It would be hearsay unless there is testimony... that the employer does something to verify the information."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013294.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,393 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 16 of 262 1721
LC8Cmax1
LC8Cmax1
1 that's a document created by managers at Mar-a-Lago and not the
2 employee.
3 THE COURT: I think, probably, 823 comes in, depending
4 on the business record foundation, which essentially
5 provides -- right. So this is a personnel form of Mar-a-Lago
6 that your witness will testify they maintained in their records
7 of employees?
8 MR. ROHRBACH: Yes, your Honor.
9 THE COURT: So that, I think, you're right.
10 Ms. Sternheim, do you have an objection to 823?
11 MS. STERNHEIM: No.
12 THE COURT: 824, I think that Ms. Sternheim is right,
13 that the information filled out by the employee, which you're
14 seeking to assert for the truth, essentially that Virginia
15 Roberts was his daughter, as I understand it.
16 MR. ROHRBACH: Yes, your Honor.
17 THE COURT: It would be hearsay unless there is
18 testimony -- under the Lieberman case, unless there is
19 testimony that the employer does something to verify the
20 information.
21 MR. ROHRBACH: I've never asked that question of
22 Ms. Gill, your Honor. I'm happy to do so while we're waiting
23 for the remaining juror. I would imagine she would say that
24 Mar-a-Lago provides benefits to the daughter as a dependent of
25 Mr. Roberts. So in the sense that they are, in fact, providing
2 employee.
3 THE COURT: I think, probably, 823 comes in, depending
4 on the business record foundation, which essentially
5 provides -- right. So this is a personnel form of Mar-a-Lago
6 that your witness will testify they maintained in their records
7 of employees?
8 MR. ROHRBACH: Yes, your Honor.
9 THE COURT: So that, I think, you're right.
10 Ms. Sternheim, do you have an objection to 823?
11 MS. STERNHEIM: No.
12 THE COURT: 824, I think that Ms. Sternheim is right,
13 that the information filled out by the employee, which you're
14 seeking to assert for the truth, essentially that Virginia
15 Roberts was his daughter, as I understand it.
16 MR. ROHRBACH: Yes, your Honor.
17 THE COURT: It would be hearsay unless there is
18 testimony -- under the Lieberman case, unless there is
19 testimony that the employer does something to verify the
20 information.
21 MR. ROHRBACH: I've never asked that question of
22 Ms. Gill, your Honor. I'm happy to do so while we're waiting
23 for the remaining juror. I would imagine she would say that
24 Mar-a-Lago provides benefits to the daughter as a dependent of
25 Mr. Roberts. So in the sense that they are, in fact, providing
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013294
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document