DOJ-OGR-00002874.jpg
630 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
7
Organizations
7
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
630 KB
Summary
This is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated March 29, 2021, regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The government seeks to clarify a previous statement from October 2020 where it claimed no involvement by its prosecution team in an earlier 'Florida Investigation'. The letter now states that new information suggests the FBI's New York Office may have participated in that Florida investigation between 2005 and 2010, and the government is reviewing files to determine the extent of the interaction.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge, United States District Court |
Recipient of the letter, addressed as 'The Honorable Alison J. Nathan' and 'Dear Judge Nathan'.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Named in the case reference line: 'Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)'.
|
| Silvio J. Mollo |
The U.S. Attorney's Office building is named 'The Silvio J. Mollo Building'.
|
Organizations (7)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| U.S. Department of Justice | government agency |
Sender of the letter, as indicated by the letterhead.
|
| United States Attorney, Southern District of New York | government agency |
The specific office within the Department of Justice sending the letter.
|
| United States District Court, Southern District of New York | government agency |
The court where Judge Alison J. Nathan presides and the recipient of the letter.
|
| Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) | government agency |
Mentioned in relation to its New York and Florida offices' potential involvement in the 'Florida Investigation'.
|
| FBI New York Office | government agency |
Mentioned as potentially having participated in the Florida Investigation between 2005 and 2010.
|
| FBI’s Palm Beach Resident Agency (the “FBI Florida Office”) | government agency |
Its files were reviewed for documentation of interaction with the FBI New York Office.
|
| United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern | government agency |
Mentioned as an entity the FBI New York Office may have interacted with.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2021-03-29
The Government filed a letter with the Court to clarify a statement made in a prior letter regarding the Florida Investigation.
Southern District of New York
between 2005 and 2010
An investigation in Florida, referred to as the 'Florida Investigation', which predated the current investigation against Ghislaine Maxwell. Information suggests the FBI New York Office may have participated.
Florida
Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) New York Office
FBI’s Palm Beach Resident Agency
United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern
Locations (7)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The jurisdiction of the United States Attorney and the District Court involved in the letter.
|
|
|
The building housing the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York.
|
|
|
Address of the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York.
|
|
|
The location of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
|
|
|
Address of the United States Courthouse for the Southern District of New York.
|
|
|
Location of a prior investigation, referred to as the 'Florida Investigation'.
|
|
|
Location of an FBI Resident Agency.
|
Relationships (2)
The case is titled 'United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell', indicating the U.S. government is prosecuting Ghislaine Maxwell.
The Government reviewed files for 'documentation indicating that the FBI New York Office interacted with the FBI Florida Office'.
Key Quotes (1)
"The Prosecution Team in this case had no involvement in the Florida Investigation, which predated the instant investigation by approximately eight years."Source
— The Government
(A statement from a prior letter dated October 7, 2020, which the current letter is intended to clarify.)
DOJ-OGR-00002874.jpg
Quote #1
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,732 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 190 Filed 03/29/21 Page 1 of 3
U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
Southern District of New York
The Silvio J. Mollo Building
One Saint Andrew’s Plaza
New York, New York 10007
One Saint Andrew’s Plaza
New York, New York 10007
March 29, 2021
VIA ECF
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
United States Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, New York 10007
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
United States Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, New York 10007
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Dear Judge Nathan:
The Government respectfully submits this letter to clarify a statement in its prior letter to the Court in the above-referenced case dated October 7, 2020 (the “Letter”). (Dkt. No. 63). In the Letter, the Government stated, “The Prosecution Team in this case had no involvement in the Florida Investigation, which predated the instant investigation by approximately eight years.” (Letter at 4). Although it is certainly correct that none of the individual prosecutors, agents, or investigators on the Prosecution Team had any involvement in the Florida Investigation, the Government writes to bring the following additional facts to the Court’s attention.
Recently, defense counsel brought to the Government’s attention information suggesting that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) New York Office may have participated in certain aspects of the Florida Investigation between 2005 and 2010. In response, the Government has reviewed portions of its files, including portions of the file of the FBI’s Palm Beach Resident Agency (the “FBI Florida Office”), for documentation indicating that the FBI New York Office interacted with the FBI Florida Office or with the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern
DOJ-OGR-00002874
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document