DOJ-OGR-00000552.jpg
570 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
570 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019. In it, the judge (THE COURT) raises a concern based on a New York Post article suggesting Mr. Epstein was not in compliance with his sex offender registration obligations in New York. A speaker, Mr. Weinberg, responds that while he is aware of the story, Mr. Epstein has never been officially informed of any violation by New York authorities.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Honor | Judge |
Addressed by a speaker as "your Honor" and identified as "THE COURT" when speaking.
|
| Mr. Epstein |
Subject of discussion regarding his compliance with New York state sex offender registration obligations.
|
|
| Mr. Weinberg | Counsel (implied) |
A speaker in the transcript, responding to the court's questions and making statements on behalf of Mr. Epstein.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| New York Post | company |
Mentioned as the source of a newspaper story about Mr. Epstein's sex offender registration.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2019-07-24
A court hearing where the judge and a counsel (Mr. Weinberg) discuss Mr. Epstein's compliance with sex offender registration in New York.
Courtroom (implied)
THE COURT
Mr. Weinberg
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in relation to legal proceedings, sex offender registration obligations, and the "New York side" of an issue.
|
Relationships (1)
Mr. Weinberg speaks on behalf of Mr. Epstein in court, stating he has checked with counsel and that Mr. Epstein has not been informed of any violation, indicating a lawyer-client relationship.
Key Quotes (2)
"The thrust of that story was that Mr. Epstein -- or at least it appeared to me to be the thrust -- was not in compliance with his obligations in New York."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge is summarizing a story they read in the New York Post regarding Mr. Epstein.)
DOJ-OGR-00000552.jpg
Quote #1
"But what I can say is nobody on the New York side has ever informed Mr. Epstein, despite the now ten-day deluge of publicity, that he has ever been in violation."Source
— MR. WEINBERG
(Responding to the judge's mention of the newspaper story, arguing that Mr. Epstein has not been officially notified of any violation.)
DOJ-OGR-00000552.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,483 characters)
Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 36 Filed 07/24/19 Page 42 of 74 42
1 with the mandates, whether it's an administrative agency or a
2 court's bail release order.
3 Three, I know of no other proceedings, in answer to
4 the question your Honor asked -- I think it was question two --
5 like the proceedings in New York.
6 I will verify that with the counsel in the different
7 jurisdictions who can provide primary rather than secondary or
8 hearsay evidence so we can give you in an additional submission
9 some meaningful and particularized responses to your Honor's
10 questions of this morning.
11 THE COURT: That would be helpful.
12 There are two things. One is another disclosure on my
13 part. I did happen to read in the New York Post a story about
14 the New York state sex offender registration.
15 The thrust of that story was that Mr. Epstein -- or at
16 least it appeared to me to be the thrust -- was not in
17 compliance with his obligations in New York.
18 Again, it's a newspaper story. I did see it. I share
19 it with you. You probably saw it too.
20 MR. WEINBERG: I think I did. I think that's where I
21 checked with counsel, and that's where I learned of this
22 nine-day rule which I was not familiar with before checking.
23 But what I can say is nobody on the New York side has
24 ever informed Mr. Epstein, despite the now ten-day deluge of
25 publicity, that he has ever been in violation.
2 court's bail release order.
3 Three, I know of no other proceedings, in answer to
4 the question your Honor asked -- I think it was question two --
5 like the proceedings in New York.
6 I will verify that with the counsel in the different
7 jurisdictions who can provide primary rather than secondary or
8 hearsay evidence so we can give you in an additional submission
9 some meaningful and particularized responses to your Honor's
10 questions of this morning.
11 THE COURT: That would be helpful.
12 There are two things. One is another disclosure on my
13 part. I did happen to read in the New York Post a story about
14 the New York state sex offender registration.
15 The thrust of that story was that Mr. Epstein -- or at
16 least it appeared to me to be the thrust -- was not in
17 compliance with his obligations in New York.
18 Again, it's a newspaper story. I did see it. I share
19 it with you. You probably saw it too.
20 MR. WEINBERG: I think I did. I think that's where I
21 checked with counsel, and that's where I learned of this
22 nine-day rule which I was not familiar with before checking.
23 But what I can say is nobody on the New York side has
24 ever informed Mr. Epstein, despite the now ten-day deluge of
25 publicity, that he has ever been in violation.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00000552
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document