DOJ-OGR-00030478.jpg

934 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
3
Organizations
6
Locations
0
Events
1
Relationships
8
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 934 KB
Summary

This document is page 3 of a legal letter dated June 5, 2006, from the Law Offices of Gerald B. Lefcourt to Ms. Lanna Belohlavek. It provides a legal analysis of sex offender registration laws in New York, California, Colorado, and Florida, particularly concerning convictions from other jurisdictions. The letter highlights that courts in states like New York and California may examine the underlying conduct of an offense, rather than just its formal elements, to determine if registration is required.

People (4)

Name Role Context
GERALD B. LEFCOURT Attorney
Mentioned in the letterhead of the law office.
Lanna Belohlavek Recipient
Addressed as the recipient of the letter.
Burden Defendant
Mentioned in the case citation 'People v. Burden'.
Millan Defendant
Mentioned in the case citation 'People v. Millan'.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
LAW OFFICES OF GERALD B. LEFCOURT, P.C. company
Appears on the letterhead as the sender of the document.
Sup. Ct. Bronx Cty. government agency
Mentioned in a case citation for 'People v. Burden'.
Sup. Ct. N.Y. Cty. government agency
Mentioned in a case citation for 'People v. Millan'.

Locations (6)

Location Context
Discussed in detail regarding its sex offender registration laws.
Discussed in detail regarding its sex offender registration laws.
Discussed in detail regarding its sex offender registration laws.
Discussed in detail regarding its sex offender registration laws (Megan's Law).
Mentioned as the location of the Supreme Court in a case citation.
Mentioned as the location of the Supreme Court in a case citation.

Relationships (1)

GERALD B. LEFCOURT professional Lanna Belohlavek
The document is a legal letter from the law office of Gerald B. Lefcourt addressed to Lanna Belohlavek, indicating a professional relationship, likely attorney-client or attorney-colleague.

Key Quotes (8)

"all the essential elements"
Source
— N.Y. Corr. Law (Describing the test for requiring registration in New York for a conviction from a foreign jurisdiction.)
DOJ-OGR-00030478.jpg
Quote #1
"essential elements"
Source
— New York statute (Referenced in the context of New York courts looking beyond the formal elements of an offense.)
DOJ-OGR-00030478.jpg
Quote #2
"... since July 1, 1944, has been, or is hereafter convicted in any other court, including any state, federal, or military court, of any offense that, if committed or attempted in this state, would have been punishable as one or more of the offenses described in subparagraph (A)"
Source
— CA Penal Code § 290(a)(2)(D)(I) (Quoted from California law regarding registration requirements for out-of-state convictions.)
DOJ-OGR-00030478.jpg
Quote #3
"any lewd or lascivious act ... upon or with the body of child"
Source
— California law (Describing a registrable offense in California.)
DOJ-OGR-00030478.jpg
Quote #4
"14 or 15 years"
Source
— California law (Describing the age of the child in a specific registrable offense in California.)
DOJ-OGR-00030478.jpg
Quote #5
"that person is at least 10 years older than the child"
Source
— California law (Describing an age-difference requirement for a specific registrable offense in California.)
DOJ-OGR-00030478.jpg
Quote #6
"with the intent of arousing, appealing to, or gratifying the lust, passions, or sexual desires of that person or the child"
Source
— California law (Describing the intent requirement for a specific registrable offense in California.)
DOJ-OGR-00030478.jpg
Quote #7
"sexual offender"
Source
— Florida law (Referencing Florida's enumerated offenses under Megan's Law.)
DOJ-OGR-00030478.jpg
Quote #8

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (3,326 characters)

LAW OFFICES OF
GERALD B. LEFCOURT, P.C.
Ms. Lanna Belohlavek
June 5, 2006
Page 3
In New York, a person must register as a sex offender if they are required to register in the jurisdiction of conviction or, if convicted in a foreign jurisdiction, his conviction there meets “all the essential elements” of New York’s enumerated sexual offenses. See, N.Y. Corr. Law §§ 168-1(2)(a)(I), (d), (3). In spite of the statutory reference to “essential elements,” some New York courts have looked at the facts underlying the offense of conviction, rather than the formal elements of the offense, in determining whether registration is required. Each finding that a defendant was required to register on the basis of the underlying conduct even though the essential elements test was not satisfied. See, People v. Burden, 6 Misc.3d 1033(a)(Sup. Ct. Bronx Cty. 2005); People v. Millan, 189 Misc.2d 419, 730 N.Y.S.2d 392 (Sup. Ct. N.Y. Cty. 2001).
The same serious concern arises in other states, including California and Colorado, which authorize courts to look behind the plea, and beyond the formal elements of the offense of conviction, and enable them on a case by case basis to determine if registration is required.
Like New York, California requires an individual to register if they are required to register in the state of conviction, or pursuant to CA Penal Code § 290(a)(2)(D)(I) if that individual “... since July 1, 1944, has been, or is hereafter convicted in any other court, including any state, federal, or military court, of any offense that, if committed or attempted in this state, would have been punishable as one or more of the offenses described in subparagraph (A)”. The wording of the statute leaves open the possibility that, in determining whether the offense would have been punishable as one or more of the registrable offenses, one looks at the underlying facts, and not at the formal elements of the crime to which the defendant pled. The registrable California offenses include commission of “any lewd or lascivious act ... upon or with the body of child” where the child is “14 or 15 years” of age and “that person is at least 10 years older than the child” “with the intent of arousing, appealing to, or gratifying the lust, passions, or sexual desires of that person or the child”. CA Penal Code § 288(a), (c) (1). Thus, an aggravated assault plea may subject the client to a registration requirement in the State of California.
Colorado likewise has a very broad statute. It requires an individual to register within five business days of becoming a temporary or permanent resident of the state, if, among other things, the person has been convicted in Colorado or any other state of an offense involving sexual behavior (or an attempt, solicitation or conspiracy to commit such an offense), or if they are required to register in another state or jurisdiction for a sex offense. C.R.S.A. §§ 16-22-103, 16-22-108.
With regard to Florida, as you know, it is reasonably clear that under Florida’s current version of Megan’s Law, a plea to aggravated assault would not subject the client to registration in Florida since it is not included among the state’s enumerated “sexual offender” offenses. See
07/26/17
16998195 'ON XVd Page 11 of 131
Public Records Request No. 2006-91-NJC
DOJ-OGR-00030478

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document