This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a conversation between a judge (THE COURT), Mr. Everdell, and Ms. Comey. The discussion centers on the logistics of presenting evidence, including whether to provide a paper binder to the court and how a video will be displayed in the main courtroom but not in an overflow room. The judge gives instructions to ensure the public can view exhibits after the video is shown.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Honor | Judge |
Addressed by Mr. Everdell and Ms. Comey, and also speaks as 'THE COURT'.
|
| MR. EVERDELL | Attorney (implied) |
A speaker in the transcript, discussing evidence presentation with the court.
|
| Ms. Comey | Attorney (implied) |
A speaker in the transcript, confirming details about video playback in the courtroom with the court.
|
| Parkinson | Subject of direct examination |
Mentioned in the header: 'Parkinson - Direct'.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | government agency |
A speaker in the transcript, representing the judge presiding over the case.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript, likely the court reporting service.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in the context of confirming details with courthouse staff.
|
|
|
The location where the proceeding is taking place and where a video was tested.
|
|
|
A separate courtroom where it was confirmed a video would not play.
|
"We'll do the screens. I prefer paper."Source
"We checked and played the video in here, in this courtroom, and checked to see that it will not play in the overflow courtroom, and everything seemed to be working the way we want it to."Source
"I'll just make sure that, once the video is completed, that the screens are returned so that members of the public can see the published exhibits?"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,453 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document