DOJ-OGR-00014982.jpg
535 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
0
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript (cross-examination)
File Size:
535 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Cross-examination of witness Rocchio) filed on January 15, 2025, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330 (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The questioning focuses on Rocchio's qualifications as a forensic psychologist, specifically challenging whether they were explicitly qualified as an expert on 'grooming' in previous cases. Rocchio argues that grooming falls under 'interpersonal violence,' but admits to only testifying as a forensic psychologist approximately six times and being deposed four times.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Rocchio | Witness / Forensic Psychologist |
Being cross-examined regarding their expertise in grooming and prior testimony history.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Intervenes to ask a clarifying question about the witness's past testimony regarding grooming.
|
| Unidentified Attorney | Questioner (Defense) |
Conducting cross-examination, challenging the witness's specific qualification as an expert on 'grooming'.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Listed in the footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Implied by Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by case number 'PAE' (Judge Paul A. Engelmayer) and 'Southern District Reporters'.
|
Key Quotes (3)
"Grooming is part of the dynamic, well established to be under the rubric of interpersonal violence, so it would fall into the category in which I was declared an expert."Source
DOJ-OGR-00014982.jpg
Quote #1
"My question was, in neither of those cases were you qualified as an expert in the subject, the specific subject of grooming, correct? A. Correct."Source
DOJ-OGR-00014982.jpg
Quote #2
"So in your capacity as a forensic psychologist, you've testified maybe six times; is that right? A. Correct."Source
DOJ-OGR-00014982.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,335 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 782 Filed 01/15/25 Page 106 of 158 106
LBAAMAX3ps Rocchio - Cross
LBAAMAX3ps Rocchio - Cross
1 Q. And then the other one there was no transcript of; is that
2 correct?
3 A. That is correct.
4 Q. In either of those cases -- well, let me put it the other
5 way. In neither of those cases were you qualified as an expert
6 on grooming, correct?
7 A. Grooming is part of the dynamic, well established to be
8 under the rubric of interpersonal violence, so it would fall
9 into the category in which I was declared an expert.
10 Q. That wasn't my question. My question was, in neither of
11 those cases were you qualified as an expert in the subject, the
12 specific subject of grooming, correct?
13 A. Correct.
14 THE COURT: Did you testify about grooming in those
15 instances?
16 THE WITNESS: I testified about grooming in one of
17 those, and I testified about coercive control and dynamics in a
18 relationship in another.
19 Q. And how many times have you been actually deposed in your
20 role as a forensic psychologist?
21 A. I believe four. I'm not positive, but around that.
22 Q. So in your capacity as a forensic psychologist, you've
23 testified maybe six times; is that right?
24 A. Correct.
25 Q. OK. Now, as a forensic psychologist, you are typically
2 correct?
3 A. That is correct.
4 Q. In either of those cases -- well, let me put it the other
5 way. In neither of those cases were you qualified as an expert
6 on grooming, correct?
7 A. Grooming is part of the dynamic, well established to be
8 under the rubric of interpersonal violence, so it would fall
9 into the category in which I was declared an expert.
10 Q. That wasn't my question. My question was, in neither of
11 those cases were you qualified as an expert in the subject, the
12 specific subject of grooming, correct?
13 A. Correct.
14 THE COURT: Did you testify about grooming in those
15 instances?
16 THE WITNESS: I testified about grooming in one of
17 those, and I testified about coercive control and dynamics in a
18 relationship in another.
19 Q. And how many times have you been actually deposed in your
20 role as a forensic psychologist?
21 A. I believe four. I'm not positive, but around that.
22 Q. So in your capacity as a forensic psychologist, you've
23 testified maybe six times; is that right?
24 A. Correct.
25 Q. OK. Now, as a forensic psychologist, you are typically
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014982
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document