DOJ-OGR-00001670.jpg

536 KB

Extraction Summary

5
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
1
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 536 KB
Summary

This legal document, filed on July 28, 2020, is the U.S. Government's response to a defendant's motion in a criminal case. The Government argues against the defendant's attempt to restrict its use of gathered materials and to impose restrictions on third parties, calling the request unprecedented and without legal basis. The filing, submitted by Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss to Judge Alison J. Nathan, urges the court to deny the defendant's motion and implement the Government's own proposed protective order.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Alison J. Nathan The Honorable
The document is addressed to The Honorable Alison J. Nathan.
AUDREY STRAUSS Acting United States Attorney
Listed as the Acting United States Attorney submitting the document.
Alex Rossmiller Assistant United States Attorney
Signed on behalf of Audrey Strauss as an Assistant United States Attorney.
Alison Moe Assistant United States Attorney
Listed as one of the Assistant United States Attorneys on the filing.
Maurene Comey Assistant United States Attorney
Listed as one of the Assistant United States Attorneys on the filing.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Government government agency
Referred to throughout the document as the party opposing the defendant's motion, likely referring to the U.S. Govern...
Court government agency
Referred to as the body that should rule on the motion, specifically the court presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan.
United States Attorney government agency
The office submitting the legal filing, specifically for the Southern District of New York.

Timeline (1 events)

2020-07-28
The Government filed a document opposing the defendant's motion concerning a protective order.
Southern District of New York

Locations (1)

Location Context
The jurisdiction of the Assistant United States Attorneys who filed the document.

Relationships (2)

Government adversarial defendant
The document details the Government's opposition to a motion filed by the defendant in a criminal case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN).
AUDREY STRAUSS professional Alison J. Nathan
Audrey Strauss, as Acting U.S. Attorney, is submitting a legal argument to Judge Alison J. Nathan for a ruling.

Key Quotes (1)

"on equal footing with the defense"
Source
— defendant (Cited as the defendant's counter-argument that the Court should put third parties on equal footing with the defense.)
DOJ-OGR-00001670.jpg
Quote #1

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,422 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 33 Filed 07/28/20 Page 7 of 7
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
July 28, 2020
Page 7
of such materials provided by the defendant to the Government. But there is no basis to add additional restrictions upon the Government’s use of materials gathered by the Government itself.
The defendant’s only counter-argument, as noted—that this Court should put third parties “on equal footing with the defense”—is both unlikely to be relevant given the Government’s standard practice, as described above, and, the Government submits, an irrelevant consideration in the context of a criminal protective order. Indeed, the Government respectfully submits that neither it nor this Court is well-positioned to, or should, become the arbiter of what is appropriate or permissible in civil cases.
In sum, the defendant’s attempt to restrict the Government and to restrict third parties in this way appears to be unprecedented, and is without legal basis, and should be denied.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth above, the Court should enter the Government’s proposed protective order, which is enclosed, and deny the defendant’s motion.
Respectfully submitted,
AUDREY STRAUSS
Acting United States Attorney
By: /s/
Alex Rossmiller / Alison Moe / Maurene Comey
Assistant United States Attorneys
Southern District of New York
Tel: (212) 637-2415
Cc: All counsel of record (via ECF)
DOJ-OGR-00001670

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document