This legal document, filed on July 28, 2020, is the U.S. Government's response to a defendant's motion in a criminal case. The Government argues against the defendant's attempt to restrict its use of gathered materials and to impose restrictions on third parties, calling the request unprecedented and without legal basis. The filing, submitted by Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss to Judge Alison J. Nathan, urges the court to deny the defendant's motion and implement the Government's own proposed protective order.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alison J. Nathan | The Honorable |
The document is addressed to The Honorable Alison J. Nathan.
|
| AUDREY STRAUSS | Acting United States Attorney |
Listed as the Acting United States Attorney submitting the document.
|
| Alex Rossmiller | Assistant United States Attorney |
Signed on behalf of Audrey Strauss as an Assistant United States Attorney.
|
| Alison Moe | Assistant United States Attorney |
Listed as one of the Assistant United States Attorneys on the filing.
|
| Maurene Comey | Assistant United States Attorney |
Listed as one of the Assistant United States Attorneys on the filing.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Government | government agency |
Referred to throughout the document as the party opposing the defendant's motion, likely referring to the U.S. Govern...
|
| Court | government agency |
Referred to as the body that should rule on the motion, specifically the court presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan.
|
| United States Attorney | government agency |
The office submitting the legal filing, specifically for the Southern District of New York.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The jurisdiction of the Assistant United States Attorneys who filed the document.
|
"on equal footing with the defense"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,422 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document