This document is page 246 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' (likely by Edward Jay Epstein), stamped as evidence by the House Oversight Committee. The text details the aftermath of the Edward Snowden intelligence breach in 2013, describing it as a massive strategic setback for Western intelligence agencies (NSA, CIA, GCHQ). It discusses the strategic implications of the leak regarding Russia and China, and describes the massive damage control efforts undertaken by U.S. and British intelligence officers in Washington, Fort Meade, and Cheltenham.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Snowden | Former Intelligence Contractor / Whistleblower |
Discussed regarding the compromise of NSA documents and his location in Moscow.
|
| Sir David Omand | Former head of the British GCHQ |
Quoted describing the breach as a 'huge strategic setback' for the West.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| NSA |
National Security Agency, victim of the document breach.
|
|
| CIA |
Central Intelligence Agency, files compromised.
|
|
| GCHQ |
British Government Communications Headquarters, files compromised.
|
|
| America’s cyber military commands |
Files compromised.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location mentioned in relation to guiding or assisting Snowden.
|
|
|
Mentioned as an adversary and Snowden's location.
|
|
|
Mentioned as an adversary.
|
|
|
Location of damage control operations.
|
|
|
NSA headquarters location.
|
|
|
GCHQ headquarters location.
|
|
|
Snowden's 'new perch'.
|
"The game of nations is, after all, merely a competition among adversaries to gain advantages by the surreptitious exchange of both twisted and straight information."Source
"It was, as Sir David Omand, the former head of the British GCHQ, described it, a “huge strategic setback” for the West."Source
"The genie could not be put back into the bottle. There is not a reset button in this game."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (2,488 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document