This legal document, part of a filing on behalf of Ms. Maxwell, argues that the indictment against her is unconstitutionally vague. It claims the inconsistent use of terms like "minor victims" and "girls," combined with a lack of specific dates for alleged crimes from decades ago, prevents Maxwell from preparing an adequate defense. The filing asserts this vagueness makes it impossible to investigate the allegations or challenge the prosecution's evidence effectively at trial.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Epstein |
Mentioned in the phrase "Epstein's minor victims".
|
|
| Minor Victim-1 | Alleged Victim |
Identified as one of the minor victims in the indictment.
|
| Minor Victim-2 | Alleged Victim |
Identified as one of the minor victims in the indictment and mentioned in the context of being taken to a movie.
|
| Minor Victim-3 | Alleged Victim |
Identified as one of the minor victims in the indictment.
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
The subject of the legal filing, arguing that the indictment is too vague for her to prepare a defense.
|
"some of the minor girls"Source
"multiple minor girls"Source
"Epstein's minor victims"Source
"a minor victim"Source
"Among the victims ... were minor victims identified herein as Minor Victim-1, Minor Victim-2, and Minor Victim-3."Source
"engaged in the following acts, among others, with respect to minor victims...."Source
"befriend"Source
"being present"Source
"groomed"Source
"undressing"Source
"took Minor Victim -2 to a movie"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,482 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document