DOJ-OGR-00020666.jpg

1.21 MB

Extraction Summary

8
People
5
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court docket / case history report (sdny cm/ecf)
File Size: 1.21 MB
Summary

This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between May 14 and May 21, 2021. It details legal maneuvering regarding redactions to protect third parties and victims, as well as defense motions to suppress evidence obtained via subpoena and to strike surplusage from the indictment. Notably, it includes a judge's order admonishing the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) to ensure Maxwell's security protocols are necessary and neutral, and urging them to reduce sleep disruption.

People (8)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Subject of the court proceedings, motions, and detention orders.
Alison J. Nathan Judge
Presiding judge signing orders and memo endorsements.
Maurene Comey AUSA (Assistant US Attorney)
Prosecutor filing letters on behalf of the USA.
Alison Moe AUSA (Assistant US Attorney)
Prosecutor filing letters on behalf of the USA.
Lara Pomerantz AUSA (Assistant US Attorney)
Prosecutor filing letters on behalf of the USA.
Andrew Rohrbach AUSA (Assistant US Attorney)
Prosecutor filing letters on behalf of the USA.
Christian Everdell Defense Attorney
Attorney filing Reply Memorandums for Ghislaine Maxwell.
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Defense Attorney
Attorney filing a letter for Ghislaine Maxwell.

Organizations (5)

Name Type Context
USA
United States of America / Government / Prosecution
MDC
Metropolitan Detention Center (where Maxwell is detained)
BOP
Bureau of Prisons
SDNY
Southern District of New York (Court)
Second Circuit
Court of Appeals (cited in case law)

Timeline (3 events)

05/14/2021
Judge Nathan issues order regarding MDC sleep disruption and security protocols for Maxwell.
SDNY Court
Judge Alison J. Nathan Ghislaine Maxwell MDC BOP
05/17/2021
Memo Endorsement granting in part Government's redaction/sealing requests.
SDNY Court
Judge Alison J. Nathan
05/20/2021
Filing of Reply Memorandums of Law by Defense (Everdell) regarding suppression of evidence and striking surplusage.
SDNY Court

Locations (2)

Location Context
MDC
Detention facility housing Ghislaine Maxwell
Jurisdiction of the court

Relationships (3)

Ghislaine Maxwell Attorney/Client Christian Everdell
Everdell files Reply Memorandums in support of Maxwell (Docs 285, 286, 287).
Ghislaine Maxwell Attorney/Client Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
Pagliuca files letter on behalf of Maxwell (Doc 289).
Maurene Comey Prosecutor/Government USA
Listed as AUSA filing letters for USA.

Key Quotes (3)

"The Court also admonishes the MDC and the Government to continue to ensure that Maxwell is subjected to only those security protocols that BOP determines are necessary for her safety and security, based upon neutral and applicable factors"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020666.jpg
Quote #1
"the Court urges the MDC to consider whether sleep disruption for pretrial detainees can be reduced."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020666.jpg
Quote #2
"the Court finds that the arguments the Government has put forward in this letter, including the need to protect the privacy interests of third parties and alleged victims, favor the narrowly tailored redactions."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020666.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (4,054 characters)

Case 22-1426, Document 57, 02/28/2023, 3475900, Page48 of 208
A-44
2/22/23, 1:25 PM
SDNY CM/ECF NextGen Version 1.6
no additional specific and supported application for relief. Nevertheless, the Court urges the MDC to consider whether sleep disruption for pretrial detainees can be reduced. The Court also admonishes the MDC and the Government to continue to ensure that Maxwell is subjected to only those security protocols that BOP determines are necessary for her safety and security, based upon neutral and applicable factors, and consistent with the treatment of similarly situated pre-trial detainees. The Government shall provide a copy of this Order to the Warden and General Counsel for the MDC. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 5/14/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 05/14/2021)
05/14/2021 283 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated May 14, 2021 re: Proposed Redactions to Defendant's Letter re BSF Subpoena Document filed by USA. (Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 05/14/2021)
05/17/2021 284 MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell re: 278 Letter Proposed Redactions to Defendant's Supplemental Pre-Trial Motions... ENDORSEMENT: The Court grants in part the Government's redaction and sealing requests. Its conclusion is guided by the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). The Court concludes that these are judicial documents and that the First Amendment and common law presumptions of access attach. Id. at 11920. In balancing competing considerations against the presumption of access, the Court finds that the arguments the Government has put forward in this letter, including the need to protect the privacy interests of third parties and alleged victims, favor the narrowly tailored redactions. See United States v. Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044, 1050 (2d Cir. 1995). Similarly, the Court concludes that the Government has shown that Exhibits E, F, G, H, and I should be filed under seal. With respect to Exhibit C, however, the Court concludes that narrowly tailored redactions are sufficient to advance the privacy interests the Government has identified. Accordingly, the Government is ORDERED to confer with defense counsel and submit proposed redactions to Exhibit C by May 20, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 5/17/21)(jbo) (Entered: 05/17/2021)
05/20/2021 285 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support as to Ghislaine Maxwell re: 139 MOTION to Suppress Under the Fourth Amendment, Martindell, and the Fifth Amendment All Evidence Obtained from the Governments Subpoena to REDACTED and to Dismiss Counts Five And Six. . (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit J, # 2 Exhibit K, # 3 Exhibit L, # 4 Exhibit M, # 5 Exhibit N, # 6 Exhibit O, # 7 Exhibit P, # 8 Exhibit Q)(Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 05/20/2021)
05/20/2021 286 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support as to Ghislaine Maxwell re: 145 MOTION to Strike Surplusage from Superseding Indictment. . (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 05/20/2021)
05/20/2021 287 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support as to Ghislaine Maxwell re: 147 MOTION for Bill of Particulars and Pretrial Disclosures. . (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Filed under seal))(Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 05/20/2021)
05/20/2021 288 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated May 20, 2021 re: Proposed Redactions to Exhibit C to Defendant's Supplemental Pre-Trial Motions Document filed by USA. (Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 05/20/2021)
05/21/2021 289 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca dated May 21, 2021 re: Reply to Government Letter dated May 14 Regarding Proposed Redactions to Ms. Maxwells May 12, 2021 Letter (DE 283) (Pagliuca, Jeffrey) (Entered: 05/21/2021)
https://ecf.nysd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?211087015221896-L_1_0-1
44/113
DOJ-OGR-00020666

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document