This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between May 14 and May 21, 2021. It details legal maneuvering regarding redactions to protect third parties and victims, as well as defense motions to suppress evidence obtained via subpoena and to strike surplusage from the indictment. Notably, it includes a judge's order admonishing the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) to ensure Maxwell's security protocols are necessary and neutral, and urging them to reduce sleep disruption.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the court proceedings, motions, and detention orders.
|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
Presiding judge signing orders and memo endorsements.
|
| Maurene Comey | AUSA (Assistant US Attorney) |
Prosecutor filing letters on behalf of the USA.
|
| Alison Moe | AUSA (Assistant US Attorney) |
Prosecutor filing letters on behalf of the USA.
|
| Lara Pomerantz | AUSA (Assistant US Attorney) |
Prosecutor filing letters on behalf of the USA.
|
| Andrew Rohrbach | AUSA (Assistant US Attorney) |
Prosecutor filing letters on behalf of the USA.
|
| Christian Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Attorney filing Reply Memorandums for Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
| Jeffrey S. Pagliuca | Defense Attorney |
Attorney filing a letter for Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| USA |
United States of America / Government / Prosecution
|
|
| MDC |
Metropolitan Detention Center (where Maxwell is detained)
|
|
| BOP |
Bureau of Prisons
|
|
| SDNY |
Southern District of New York (Court)
|
|
| Second Circuit |
Court of Appeals (cited in case law)
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Detention facility housing Ghislaine Maxwell
|
|
|
Jurisdiction of the court
|
"The Court also admonishes the MDC and the Government to continue to ensure that Maxwell is subjected to only those security protocols that BOP determines are necessary for her safety and security, based upon neutral and applicable factors"Source
"the Court urges the MDC to consider whether sleep disruption for pretrial detainees can be reduced."Source
"the Court finds that the arguments the Government has put forward in this letter, including the need to protect the privacy interests of third parties and alleged victims, favor the narrowly tailored redactions."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (4,054 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document