This document is an excerpt from an OPR report analyzing the conduct of prosecutor Villafaña during the federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. It concludes that Villafaña consistently advocated for Epstein's prosecution and victims' interests, despite a public narrative suggesting collusion with defense counsel. The report details Villafaña's efforts to protect victims' anonymity, expand the case scope, and draft victim notification letters, while refuting claims that she was 'soft on Epstein' based on witness statements and email context.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Villafaña | Prosecutor / AUSA |
Consistently advocated for prosecuting Epstein, worked to expand scope of case, opposed meetings with defense, fought...
|
| Epstein | Subject of investigation/prosecution |
Case covered by Palm Beach press, Villafaña advocated for his prosecution, decisions made to hold him accountable.
|
| Sloman | Villafaña's supervisor |
Told OPR that reports of Villafaña being 'soft on Epstein' were untrue, stated Villafaña 'did her best' to implement ...
|
| Acosta | Defense Counsel (implied, or associated with defense) |
Email exchanges with Villafaña, portions redacted, some emails not located in USAO records.
|
| Lefkowitz | Defense Counsel |
Email exchanges with Villafaña.
|
| Menchel | Unknown, involved in email exchange with Villafaña |
Engaged in a lengthy and heated email exchange with Villafaña about resolving the case through a guilty plea.
|
| Lourie | Unknown, possibly a supervisor or colleague |
Told OPR he was 'surprised to see how nice she was to them' regarding Villafaña's emails in the CVRA litigation, but ...
|
| AUSA | Assistant United States Attorney |
An AUSA assisted Villafaña on the investigation and told OPR Villafaña was 'completely pro prosecution'.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| OPR |
Office of Professional Responsibility, reviewed emails, statements, and conducted interviews, issued this report.
|
|
| USAO |
United States Attorney's Office, records reviewed by OPR, interactions with victims criticized in the Report.
|
|
| Department management |
Defense counsel argued to them about Villafaña and Sloman's alleged misconduct.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Press coverage of the Epstein case.
|
|
|
Compared to Palm Beach regarding press coverage of the Epstein case.
|
|
|
Where victims might attend a plea hearing.
|
""avoid[ing] the press""Source
""if [the victims] wanted to attend [the plea hearing], I wanted them to be able to go into the courthouse without their faces being splashed all over the newspaper.""Source
""was soft on Epstein . . . couldn't have been further from the truth.""Source
""did her best to implement the decisions that were made and to hold Epstein accountable.""Source
""surprised to see how nice she was to them. And she winds up taking it on the chin for being so nice to them. When I know the whole time she was the one who wanted to go after him the most.""Source
""everything that [Villafaña] did . . . was, as far as I could tell, [ ] completely pro prosecution.""Source
""threaten[ing] to send a highly improper and unusual 'victim notification letter' to all""Source
Complete text extracted from the document (4,081 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document