EFTA00014636.pdf
66.8 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal correspondence / motion for extension of time
File Size:
66.8 KB
Summary
This document is a letter dated May 14, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan requesting a one-week extension (to May 21, 2021) to file a joint letter regarding the pretrial schedule in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter notes that the prosecution and defense conferred by phone for 45 minutes on the previous day but require more time to resolve disagreements on scheduling proposals. The signatory names of the Assistant U.S. Attorneys are redacted.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
Addressee of the letter, United States District Court Judge presiding over the case.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Defendant in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
| Audrey Strauss | United States Attorney |
Signatory authority for the letter representing the U.S. Department of Justice.
|
| Unknown (Redacted) | Assistant United States Attorneys |
Actual signatories of the letter, names redacted.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| U.S. Department of Justice |
Header organization
|
|
| United States Attorney Southern District of New York |
Prosecuting office
|
|
| United States District Court Southern District of New York |
Court where the case is being heard
|
Timeline (2 events)
2021-05-11
Court Order requiring parties to submit a joint letter regarding the overall pretrial schedule.
SDNY
2021-05-13
Parties conferred by telephone for approximately 45 minutes regarding the pretrial schedule.
Telephone
Prosecution
Defense Counsel
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
Relationships (2)
Prosecutor (US Attorney) vs Defendant in criminal case.
Prosecution Team
→
Professional/Legal
→
Defense Counsel
Jointly writing request; conferred by telephone regarding schedule.
Key Quotes (3)
"The parties respectfully and jointly write to request an extension of time to file a letter in response to the Court’s Order of May 11, 2021"Source
EFTA00014636.pdf
Quote #1
"Although the conversation was productive, there remain multiple points of disagreement."Source
EFTA00014636.pdf
Quote #2
"The requested extension will permit the parties to consider each other’s proposals as to certain deadlines"Source
EFTA00014636.pdf
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,655 characters)
U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
The Silvio J. Mollo Building
One Saint Andrew's Plaza
New York, New York 10007
United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
The Silvio J. Mollo Building
One Saint Andrew's Plaza
New York, New York 10007
May 14, 2021
BY ECF
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
United States Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, New York 10007
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
United States Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, New York 10007
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Dear Judge Nathan:
The parties respectfully and jointly write to request an extension of time to file a letter in
response to the Court’s Order of May 11, 2021, requiring the parties to submit a joint letter
regarding the overall pretrial schedule. (Dkt. No. 277). The joint letter is currently due on May
14, 2021, and the parties respectfully request an extension to May 21, 2021. No previous requests
for an extension of this deadline have been made.
response to the Court’s Order of May 11, 2021, requiring the parties to submit a joint letter
regarding the overall pretrial schedule. (Dkt. No. 277). The joint letter is currently due on May
14, 2021, and the parties respectfully request an extension to May 21, 2021. No previous requests
for an extension of this deadline have been made.
EFTA00014636
Page 2
The parties seek this extension in order to permit continuation of productive discussions
that the parties have already initiated regarding the pretrial schedule. The parties conferred
yesterday for approximately 45 minutes by telephone on that topic. Although the conversation
was productive, there remain multiple points of disagreement. The requested extension will permit
the parties to consider each other’s proposals as to certain deadlines, and to further confer with the
aim of minimizing the points of disagreement that will need to be resolved by the Court.
that the parties have already initiated regarding the pretrial schedule. The parties conferred
yesterday for approximately 45 minutes by telephone on that topic. Although the conversation
was productive, there remain multiple points of disagreement. The requested extension will permit
the parties to consider each other’s proposals as to certain deadlines, and to further confer with the
aim of minimizing the points of disagreement that will need to be resolved by the Court.
Respectfully submitted,
AUDREY STRAUSS
United States Attorney
United States Attorney
By: s/
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
Assistant United States Attorneys
Southern District of New York
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
Assistant United States Attorneys
Southern District of New York
Cc: Defense counsel (By ECF)
EFTA00014637
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document