This document is a legal letter dated August 27, 2009, from Robert D. Critton, Jr. of Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP to Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. of Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. It concerns the case Jane Doe No. 4 v. Epstein, informing Mermelstein that Mr. Epstein intends to be present at his client's deposition as a party-defendant, but will not engage in conversation with Mermelstein's client.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| J. Michael Burman | Attorney |
Listed as partner at Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP
|
| Gregory W. Coleman | Attorney |
Listed as partner at Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP
|
| Robert D. Critton, Jr. | Attorney |
Signatory of the letter and partner at Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP
|
| Bernard Lebedeker | Attorney |
Listed as partner at Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP
|
| Mark T. Luttier | Attorney |
Listed as partner at Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP
|
| Jeffrey C. Pepin | Attorney |
Listed as partner at Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP
|
| Michase J. Pike | Attorney |
Listed as partner at Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP
|
| Heather McNamara Ruda | Attorney |
Listed as partner at Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP
|
| David Yarema | Attorney |
Listed as partner at Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP
|
| Adelqu! J. Benavente | Paralegal/Investigator |
Listed at Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP
|
| Jessica Cadwell | Paralegal |
Listed at Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP
|
| Bobbie M. McKenna | Paralegal |
Listed at Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP
|
| Ashlie Stoken-Baring | Paralegal |
Listed at Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP
|
| Betty Stokes | Paralegal |
Listed at Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP
|
| Rita H. Budnyk | Of Counsel |
Listed at Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP
|
| Ed Ricci | Special Consumer Justice Counsel |
Listed at Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP
|
| Stuart S. Mermelstein | Attorney |
Recipient of the letter, from Herman & Mermelstein, P.A.
|
| Mr. Epstein | Party-defendant |
Subject of the lawsuit Jane Doe No. 4 v. Epstein, intends to be present at a deposition
|
| Jack A. Goldberger | Attorney |
Cc recipient of the letter
|
| Jane Doe No. 4 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in the lawsuit Jane Doe No. 4 v. Epstein
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP |
Sender of the letter, a law firm
|
|
| Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. |
Law firm of the recipient Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Address of Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP
|
|
|
Address of Herman & Mermelstein, P.A.
|
|
|
State where attorneys are certified and admitted to practice
|
|
|
State where some attorneys are admitted to practice
|
"Please be advised that Mr. Epstein plans to be in attendance at the deposition of your client."Source
"He does not intend to engage in any conversation with your client."Source
"However, It is certainly his right as a party-defendant in the lawsuit to be present and to assist counsel in the defense of any case."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,381 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document