DOJ-OGR-00008562.jpg

484 KB

Extraction Summary

1
People
1
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 484 KB
Summary

This document is a jury instruction from a criminal case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on December 18, 2021. It outlines the first element the government must prove against the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, for Count Two: Enticement to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity. The instruction defines key legal terms for the jury, including "interstate commerce" and the standard for acting "knowingly," explaining that intent can be inferred from conduct and circumstances.

People (1)

Name Role Context
Ms. Maxwell Defendant
Mentioned as the individual who must be proven to have knowingly persuaded, induced, enticed, or coerced an individua...

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
government government agency
The prosecuting party that must prove the elements of Count Two beyond a reasonable doubt.

Timeline (1 events)

Jury instruction (Instruction No. 15) for Count Two: Enticement to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity, defining the first element of the charge and the legal standard for acting 'knowingly'.

Locations (2)

Location Context
Included in the definition of the term "State".
Included in the definition of the term "State".

Relationships (1)

government Adversarial (legal) Ms. Maxwell
The document outlines the burden of proof the 'government' has to meet to convict 'Ms. Maxwell' on a criminal charge.

Key Quotes (4)

"The first element of Count Two which the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt is that Ms. Maxwell knowingly persuaded or induced or enticed or coerced an individual to travel in interstate or foreign commerce, as alleged in the Indictment."
Source
— The Court (in jury instructions) (Defining the first element the prosecution must prove for Count Two.)
DOJ-OGR-00008562.jpg
Quote #1
"The term “interstate commerce” simply means movement from one state to another."
Source
— The Court (in jury instructions) (Providing a legal definition for the jury.)
DOJ-OGR-00008562.jpg
Quote #2
"An act is done knowingly when it is done voluntarily and intentionally and not because of accident, mistake, or some other innocent reason."
Source
— The Court (in jury instructions) (Defining the legal standard for the term "knowingly".)
DOJ-OGR-00008562.jpg
Quote #3
"Whether Ms. Maxwell acted knowingly may be proven by Ms. Maxwell’s conduct and by all of the facts and circumstances surrounding the case."
Source
— The Court (in jury instructions) (Instructing the jury on how to determine if the defendant acted knowingly.)
DOJ-OGR-00008562.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,259 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 563 Filed 12/18/21 Page 24 of 167
1 Instruction No. 15: Count Two: Enticement to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity – First
2 Element
3 The first element of Count Two which the government must prove beyond a reasonable
4 doubt is that Ms. Maxwell knowingly persuaded or induced or enticed or coerced an individual
5 to travel in interstate or foreign commerce, as alleged in the Indictment. The terms “persuaded,”
6 “induced,” “enticed,” and “coerced” have their ordinary, everyday meanings.
7 The term “interstate commerce” simply means movement from one state to another. The
8 term “State” includes a State of the United States and the District of Columbia.
9 “Knowingly” Defined
10 Ms. Maxwell must have acted knowingly. An act is done knowingly when it is done
11 voluntarily and intentionally and not because of accident, mistake, or some other innocent reason.
12 Now, knowledge is a matter of inference from the proven facts. Science has not yet
13 devised a manner of looking into a person’s mind and knowing what that person is thinking.
14 Whether Ms. Maxwell acted knowingly may be proven by Ms. Maxwell’s conduct and by all of
15 the facts and circumstances surrounding the case.
23
DOJ-OGR-00008562

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document