This document is a jury instruction from a criminal case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on December 18, 2021. It outlines the first element the government must prove against the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, for Count Two: Enticement to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity. The instruction defines key legal terms for the jury, including "interstate commerce" and the standard for acting "knowingly," explaining that intent can be inferred from conduct and circumstances.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
Mentioned as the individual who must be proven to have knowingly persuaded, induced, enticed, or coerced an individua...
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| government | government agency |
The prosecuting party that must prove the elements of Count Two beyond a reasonable doubt.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Included in the definition of the term "State".
|
|
|
Included in the definition of the term "State".
|
"The first element of Count Two which the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt is that Ms. Maxwell knowingly persuaded or induced or enticed or coerced an individual to travel in interstate or foreign commerce, as alleged in the Indictment."Source
"The term “interstate commerce” simply means movement from one state to another."Source
"An act is done knowingly when it is done voluntarily and intentionally and not because of accident, mistake, or some other innocent reason."Source
"Whether Ms. Maxwell acted knowingly may be proven by Ms. Maxwell’s conduct and by all of the facts and circumstances surrounding the case."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,259 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document