This document is page 55 of a larger manuscript stamped by the House Oversight Committee. It contains a narrative description of a conversation where a man (likely the subject of the investigation) explains the mathematical concept of 'Cusp Catastrophe' theory to the narrator. The speaker uses analogies involving the cost of war, prison riots, and dog aggression (referencing Konrad Lorenz and Christopher Zeeman) to define 'normal factors' versus 'splitting factors' in a bifurcated system.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Christopher Zeeman | Mathematician |
Mentioned as being from Warwick Mathematics Institute; applied theory to dog expressions.
|
| Konrad Lorenz | Ethologist/Scientist |
Mentioned for sketching facial expressions of dogs.
|
| Unnamed Male Speaker ('He') | Subject/Lecturer |
The person speaking and pacing, explaining the theory to the narrator. (In the context of these documents, this is of...
|
| Narrator ('I') | Listener/Author |
The person listening to the explanation.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Warwick Mathematics Institute |
Associated with Christopher Zeeman, located in England.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of Warwick Mathematics Institute.
|
"Cost of, or ability to wage war varies from the front to back, and serves as the splitting factor."Source
"Considering prison riots, social tension is the normal factor and alienation (degree of identification with prison authority) is the splitting factor."Source
"He paced as he talked, occasionally looking up to see if I was following him."Source
"The entire visualizable object is called a cusp catastrophe"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (2,523 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document