This document is a digital message log from March 2017, produced during a House Oversight investigation. It captures conversations involving an email address associated with Jeffrey Epstein (jeeitunes@gmail.com) discussing a potential meeting between 'Bg' (likely Bill Gates) and Donald Trump, which the sender dismisses as a 'waste of time,' suggesting a meeting with 'Barrack' instead. Other messages identify Jonah Goldman as a senior political adviser to 'Bg' and include a recommendation for a female friend described as 'smart no drama,' followed by a query about being in NYC.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| jeeitunes@gmail.com | Sender |
Sender of the first visible full message. This email address is known to be associated with Jeffrey Epstein.
|
| Bg | Subject of discussion |
Referenced as meeting with Trump and having a senior political adviser. In this context, 'Bg' likely refers to Bill G...
|
| Trump | Subject of discussion |
Donald Trump. Mentioned in relation to a meeting with 'Bg' on March 20/21.
|
| Barrack | Subject of discussion |
Likely Tom Barrack. Sender suggests 'he' (Bg) should meet with Barrack instead of Trump.
|
| Jonah Goldman | Political Adviser |
Linked via LinkedIn profile. Identified in subsequent message as 'Bg senior political adviser'.
|
| Unknown Woman | Subject of recommendation |
Described as 'super nice', 'My friend', and 'smart no drama women' in a recommendation link to the VA.gov directory.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
|
Platform hosting Jonah Goldman's profile.
|
||
| VA.gov |
Department of Veterans Affairs website linked in a message.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Indicated by the footer stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027203'.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
New York City. Sender asks 'Are you in NYC'.
|
"Bg meets w trump march 20/21 (tbc)"Source
"a waste of time. he should meet with barrack"Source
"Bg senior political adviser"Source
"She's super nice by the way. My friend. If your guys need smart no drama women --"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,341 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document