DOJ-OGR-00010472.jpg
732 KB
Extraction Summary
7
People
5
Organizations
2
Locations
4
Events
3
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
732 KB
Summary
This legal document details the allegedly poor and dehumanizing conditions of Ms. Maxwell's pre-trial detention. It argues that inadequate nutrition, sleep deprivation, psychological threats, and significant technical difficulties with discovery materials severely weakened her and thwarted her ability to prepare her defense. The document suggests these conditions were intentionally imposed to satisfy various government and legal parties following Epstein's death.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Detainee/Defendant |
The central subject of the document, describing the conditions of her detention and the impact on her ability to prep...
|
| warden | Prison official |
Mentioned in the context of an extra blanket being removed because it had not been approved by the warden.
|
| guards | Prison staff |
Observed Ms. Maxwell shaking, became concerned she was having a seizure, and returned her blanket.
|
| high-ranking prison guard | Prison official |
Told Ms. Maxwell that there was concern she would be shot by a sniper.
|
| Epstein |
Mentioned in the context of Ms. Maxwell filling his 'empty seat'.
|
|
| prosecutors | Legal role |
Mentioned as a group whose concerns were satisfied by Ms. Maxwell's treatment.
|
| accusers | Legal role |
Mentioned as a group whose concerns were satisfied by Ms. Maxwell's treatment.
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| DOJ | government agency |
Department of Justice, mentioned as one of the government entities whose concerns were satisfied by Ms. Maxwell's det...
|
| BOP | government agency |
Bureau of Prisons, mentioned as one of the government entities whose concerns were satisfied by Ms. Maxwell's detention.
|
| MDC | government agency |
Metropolitan Detention Center, mentioned as one of the government entities whose concerns were satisfied, and as the ...
|
| Court | government entity |
Mentioned as an entity whose concerns were satisfied by Ms. Maxwell's detention.
|
| CorrLinks | company |
The email system used in the prison, receipt of which was delayed and whose emails were prematurely deleted by the MDC.
|
Timeline (4 events)
Ms. Maxwell was subjected to undignified and dehumanizing conditions of detention, including inadequate nutrition, sleep deprivation, cold temperatures, and limited exercise.
MDC
Ms. Maxwell's ability to prepare her defense was thwarted by her detention conditions, the pandemic, and persistent technical issues with a laptop and prison PC for reviewing electronic discovery.
MDC
Ms. Maxwell was transferred to the general population, which the document suggests was correlated to the belief she was sufficiently safeguarded to 'fill Epstein's empty seat'.
MDC
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The location where Ms. Maxwell experienced cold temperatures.
|
|
|
The section of the prison Ms. Maxwell was transferred to.
|
Relationships (3)
The document implies a connection by stating Ms. Maxwell was safeguarded to 'fill Epstein’s empty seat'.
The document describes her complaints being treated as a 'nuisance', her blanket being removed, and a guard telling her of a sniper threat, suggesting a hostile or intimidating environment.
The document frames her treatment as a means of 'satisfying the concerns' of these entities, positioning them as antagonists to her.
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,152 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 663 Filed 06/15/22 Page 26 of 77
effluvium (hair loss due to stress and poor nutrition). Complaints made during trial regarding her inadequate daily nutrition were received as a nuisance rather than cause for concern and attention.
An extra blanket provided because of the cold temperature in her cell was removed on the claim it had not been approved by the warden, only to be returned when guards observed Ms. Maxwell shaking while asleep and became concerned that she might be having a seizure. She was given limited time to exercise in an area without sunlight or fresh air, then constructively denied the ability to exercise because she was not provided proper-fitting footwear.
The treatment imposed on Ms. Maxwell was unnecessarily and intentionally degrading and threatening. While in isolation, a high-ranking prison guard told Ms. Maxwell that there was concern that she would be shot by sniper. Putting aside the reason and propriety of dispensing this alarming information, the diminution of security concerns resulting in her transfer to general population appears correlated to Ms. Maxwell having been sufficiently safeguarded to fill Epstein’s empty seat – satisfying the concerns of the government, DOJ, BOP, MDC, prosecutors, Court, and accusers.
Deprived of sleep and adequate nutrition and subjected to such undignified and dehumanizing conditions of detention, Ms. Maxwell was considerably weakened psychologically and had great difficulty concentrating, thwarting her ability to participate in and prepare her defense. The impact of the pandemic coupled with the restrictive conditions of her confinement made preparation for trial involving multi-million pages of documents especially difficult. Despite being given a laptop, she encountered persistent technical issues reviewing electronic discovery, at times unreadable on both the laptop and prison PC, and could not search, highlight, annotate, save, or print. Further, delivery of her mail (legal and non-legal) was significantly delayed as were receipt of CorrLinks emails, which were prematurely deleted by the MDC.
25
DOJ-OGR-00010472
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document