EFTA00019882.pdf
45.5 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
0
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email chain
File Size:
45.5 KB
Summary
This document is an internal email chain from December 23, 2019, among staff and contractors at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). They are discussing the location and existence of deposition transcripts from the 'Roberts v. Maxwell' civil suit stored on an 'Epstein share drive.' Specifically, they confirm that a redacted female individual was deposed but 'invoked 5 throughout' (referring to the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination).
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Redacted Senders/Recipients | USANYS Staff/Contractors |
Multiple US Attorney's Office (SDNY) employees discussing case evidence.
|
| Virginia Roberts | Plaintiff |
Mentioned in the case name 'Roberts v. Maxwell'.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Mentioned in the case name 'Roberts v. Maxwell'.
|
| Unknown Female Deponent | Witness/Subject |
A female individual whose name is redacted; the email notes she was deposed but 'invoked 5 throughout' (Fifth Amendme...
|
Organizations (2)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
Relationships (2)
Mention of 'Roberts v. Maxwell civil suit'
USANYS discussing her deposition where she invoked the 5th Amendment
Key Quotes (3)
"She was deposed, but she invoked 5 throughout. We have the transcript, but it's just her asserting the privilege over and over."Source
EFTA00019882.pdf
Quote #1
"Yes, I believe we have all of the transcripts from all of the depositions in the Roberts v. Maxwell civil suit."Source
EFTA00019882.pdf
Quote #2
"They are on the Epstein share drive."Source
EFTA00019882.pdf
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,552 characters)
From: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) [Contractor]" <[Redacted]>
Cc: "[Redacted]" <[Redacted]>; "[Redacted]" <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: [Redacted]
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 17:15:05 +0000
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) [Contractor]" <[Redacted]>
Cc: "[Redacted]" <[Redacted]>; "[Redacted]" <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: [Redacted]
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 17:15:05 +0000
Yes, I believe we have all of the transcripts from all of the depositions in the Roberts v. Maxwell civil suit. They are on the Epstein share drive. I don't have my laptop with me, so I can't send them via email. Do you have access to the share? If so, I can tell you where to look for them there.
On Dec 23, 2019, at 2:02 PM, [Redacted] (USANYS) [Contractor] <[Redacted]> wrote:
Separate from [Redacted] - do you all have the full transcripts of the depositions? At various points [Redacted] and [Redacted] have asked me to find transcripts and I've only found excerpts from summary judgement exhibits unsealed by the 2nd circuit.
From: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Sent: Monday, December 23, 2019 11:59 AM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) [Redacted]; [Redacted] (USANYS) [Contractor] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: [Redacted]
Sent: Monday, December 23, 2019 11:59 AM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) [Redacted]; [Redacted] (USANYS) [Contractor] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: [Redacted]
She was deposed, but she invoked 5 throughout. We have the transcript, but it's just her asserting the privilege over and over.
On Dec 23, 2019, at 1:57 PM, [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]> wrote:
Hey Guys -- Not sure if any of you are around this week, but if so, quick question from [Redacted] -- do you know if [Redacted] was deposed as part of the Roberts-Maxwell litigation and, if so, do we have a transcript?
Thanks,
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
EFTA00019882
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document