DOJ-OGR-00021039.jpg
606 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
5
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
606 KB
Summary
This legal document, dated February 28, 2023, analyzes evidence to determine if a sex trafficking conspiracy involving Epstein continued into late 2004. It scrutinizes the testimony of a woman named Carolyn, detailing her visits to Epstein's house, phone calls she made to him in the summer of 2004, and her final visit in 2005 after she turned 18. The analysis suggests a lack of evidence for conspiratorial conduct in the specific period of November-December 2004.
People (2)
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| government | Government agency |
Cited Carolyn's testimony in a legal proceeding.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the document, likely the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceedings.
|
Timeline (5 events)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
A location Carolyn visited multiple times, including after giving birth in 2004 and for the last time in 2005 when sh...
|
Key Quotes (3)
"she was 18 years old the last time she went to Epstein's house"Source
— Carolyn
(Part of Carolyn's testimony cited by the government, establishing the last visit was in 2005.)
DOJ-OGR-00021039.jpg
Quote #1
"Epstein asked if she had younger friends"Source
— Epstein
(A question asked to Carolyn during one of her visits, as recounted in her testimony.)
DOJ-OGR-00021039.jpg
Quote #2
"at 18 years old, she was too old for him"Source
— Carolyn
(Carolyn's explanation during her testimony regarding Epstein's preference.)
DOJ-OGR-00021039.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,657 characters)
Case 22-1426, Document 58, 02/28/2023, 3475901, Page213 of 221
A-413
A-413
38
M6SQmax1
M6SQmax1
me is specific and highly technical. Does the preponderance of
the evidence demonstrate that the offense to sex traffic
Carolyn continued after November 1, 2004 before she turned 18
in early 2005? In other words, does a preponderance of the
evidence establish that acts in furtherance of the conspiracy
to traffic Carolyn occurred in either November or
December 2004? Although Carolyn testified regarding contact
earlier in 2004 and after she turned 18 in 2005, there is no
evidence, either in the form of testimony or documentary
evidence, including the message pads, that demonstrates by a
preponderance of the evidence conspiratorial conduct during
those last two months of 2004 before Carolyn turned 18 in 2005.
In those portions of Carolyn's testimony cited by the
government, Carolyn stated that she was 18 years old the last
time she went to Epstein's house, which would have been in
2005. As Carolyn further explained, she returned more than
four or five times to Epstein after she gave birth to her son
in March of 2004, and that testimony is supported by message
pads entered at trial that show Carolyn called Epstein several
times in the summer of 2004: Once in late April or early May
again on July 6, and again on July 30. When she did return to
Epstein, Carolyn testified Epstein asked if she had younger
friends, and she explained during her testimony that at 18
years old, she was too old for him. Carolyn wasn't asked, and
her testimony doesn't specifically address, whether she went to
the evidence demonstrate that the offense to sex traffic
Carolyn continued after November 1, 2004 before she turned 18
in early 2005? In other words, does a preponderance of the
evidence establish that acts in furtherance of the conspiracy
to traffic Carolyn occurred in either November or
December 2004? Although Carolyn testified regarding contact
earlier in 2004 and after she turned 18 in 2005, there is no
evidence, either in the form of testimony or documentary
evidence, including the message pads, that demonstrates by a
preponderance of the evidence conspiratorial conduct during
those last two months of 2004 before Carolyn turned 18 in 2005.
In those portions of Carolyn's testimony cited by the
government, Carolyn stated that she was 18 years old the last
time she went to Epstein's house, which would have been in
2005. As Carolyn further explained, she returned more than
four or five times to Epstein after she gave birth to her son
in March of 2004, and that testimony is supported by message
pads entered at trial that show Carolyn called Epstein several
times in the summer of 2004: Once in late April or early May
again on July 6, and again on July 30. When she did return to
Epstein, Carolyn testified Epstein asked if she had younger
friends, and she explained during her testimony that at 18
years old, she was too old for him. Carolyn wasn't asked, and
her testimony doesn't specifically address, whether she went to
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.***
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00021039
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document